A botanist stranded on Mars has to grow his own way home. Andy Weir's novel and Ridley Scott's film both tell that story, but not in quite the same way.

The Book
The Martian
by Andy Weir

The Film
The Martian
Directed by Ridley Scott, 2015
🔀 What Changed
Spoiler warning: this section discusses plot changes, including the ending.
The book and the film share the same survival story, but they take different routes through it. The novel opens inside Mark Watney's own log, already stranded and speaking in his voice. The film starts earlier, on Mars with the crew, and shows the storm that forces the evacuation. Watney's story then reaches us through video logs and an ensemble cast. The novel is also far more technical and profane, giving long stretches to the chemistry, math and engineering behind each fix. The film compresses much of that into shorter beats and a lighter, PG-13 register. Several obstacles on Watney's long drive across Mars are trimmed or dropped, so the trek moves faster on screen. The film also gives Earth-side characters more visual space, while the book keeps most of its energy locked inside Watney's own narration. In both versions Watney's survival comes down to problem-solving and humor, not luck.
🎙️ What the Author Said
Andy Weir has spoken publicly and warmly about the film adaptation and the team behind it. He began the story as a serialized web project before it became a published novel, and he has talked in interviews about the surreal path from self-publishing to a major studio release. Sources reviewed here do not support attributing a detailed scene-by-scene critique to him, so none is offered. The documented record shows an author who was supportive of the film, not one in conflict with it.
“I'm gonna have to science the shit out of this.”
Two versions of one stranded astronaut, and only one vote to cast. Which one wins on your shelf?














